what the bleep do we know debunked

[1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. He claims the drop was achieved. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? What the #$*! Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Quantum physics doesn't need them to. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. Gifted and talented kids: how do you nurture a curious mind. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. You are free to comment as you wish. We don't know which way it's going to go. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. And wait-the human body is mostly water! To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. log out. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. (Source: iStockphoto). last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor That's not always true, but it's often true. It is just a movie. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. and published a study guide. It was one of the most important moments in history. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". - - Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. The brain wasn't born yesterday. Some credible researchers appear, including neurologist Andrew Newberg and physicist David Albert (Albert has since disassociated himself from the film, saying his views were misrepresented). You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. Moreover, assume that they want your money. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. The pity of it is that there are fascinating conversations going on in the science-and-religion sphere. Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . [an error occurred while processing this directive]. I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Down The Rabbit Hole\". People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. Film / What the #$*! I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Get ABC Sciences weekly newsletter Science Updates, The 'underground astronaut' in search of ancient bones, Voyager probes still signalling from the edge of the Solar System, Solar eclipses: Everything you need to know, Five ways your smartphone could help save lives, Chinese scientists use satellite to smash quantum entanglement record, Einstein's light bending theory directly observed in distant stars for first time, Third gravitational wave detection puts new spin on black holes. Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. What was new? I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. " " " !". But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. The observer can't be ignored." As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. Sol. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. "What The Bleep Do We Know? He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. Your subscription to It is my task to convince you not to turn away because you don't understand it. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. You can't change the world by thinking about it. But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. . Amit Gotswami ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. We The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. asks nothing but . The host of the show said this was done because it was negative But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 what the bleep do we know watch online free, what the bleep do we know trailer, what the bleep do we know movie, what the bleep do we know debunked, what the bleep do . The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. Featuring two (!) "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. Where were we now? "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Nobody does.". It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. Z. Knight and her pet dead guy Ramtha. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. ", Critics offered mixed reviews as seen on the film review website Rotten Tomatoes, where it scored a "Rotten" 34% score with an average score of 4.6/10, based on 77 reviews. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. You can't just hope for the best. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. What the Bleep Do We Know!? "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. Science Monitor has expired. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. [17] Eric Scerri in a review for Committee for Skeptical Inquiry dismisses it as "a hodgepodge of all kinds of crackpot nonsense," where "science [is] distorted and sensationalized".

First Century House In Bethlehem, James Hill Obituary California, Articles W